Skip to main content

The Internet in 1995

Recently I was clearing through a box of old stuff, and I found a copy of ".Net - The Internet Magazine" from March 1995. Seeing the magazine again reminded when I bought it - I was in my third year at University, and the only practical way I had to get onto the net was to use the Sun Sparcstations in the university lab. From what I remember of the internet in 1995, most of it was about Monty Python or Star Trek. What I found in the old magazine pretty much supported that memory.

Some interesting snippets from this important historical document include:

An article with the headline "Microsoft's on-line plan still waiting - The Microsoft Network is raring to go, but Windows 95 is delayed, yet again.". The article explains that Microsoft expects their on-line commercial services such as MSN to become 'as popular as TV'. MSN is planned to be an AOL-type network with proprietary content not available on the main internet. Meanwhile, the shipping date for Windows 95 has been put back for a third time, to August 1995.

Another article with headline: "Windows NT: the easy option", explains that Windows NT 3.5 comes complete with FTP, gopher and Web server software. However IIS wasn't around yet (it first appeared as an add-on for NT 3.51, a few months later). The internet server software for NT 3.5 was freeware that had been developed by the European Microsoft Windows NT Academic Centre for universities and colleges that run Windows NT servers.

On the cover the magazine estimated that 23.5 million people were 'netsurfing' daily in March 1995. Although inside the magazine, William Poel points out that "The last time I looked, combined sales of Internet magazines in the UK were running at about 5 times the number of actual dial-up accounts". So in 1995 people seemed to be spending more time reading about the internet than actually getting on to it. In January 2008, the estimate of the number of people regularly online was 357.9 million, although they no longer call the metric 'people netsurfing daily', they call it the 'Active Digital Media Universe'.

Magazine writer Daniel Dern discussed the difficulty users have finding their way around the web:
"Most of the "making the internet easier to use" announcements we see are for front-end software programs, which are much easier to produce than the intelligent searching agents we all really need. In the meantime, searching the internet remains slightly less difficult than decoding a restaurant menu in a foreign language - with the best way to surf being to visit Home Pages and hotlists that other people have gone to the trouble of setting up, such as the justifiably popular Yahoo at http://akebono.stanford.edu/yahoo/."
At that time, Yahoo was a large collection of categorised links - it was already very popular and would start its transformation into a major web portal in the following years. The research project that led to Google would not begin until January 1996, and would initially also have a Stanford URL: google.stanford.edu. The domain google.com was eventually registered on 15th September 1997.

The magazine had a go at reviewing the popular browsers of the day, but this was a largely academic exercise, as Netscape Navigator 1.0 had been released a few months earlier and was way ahead of everything else.


(Some browser screenshots from March 1995, when grey page backgrounds were all the rage)

The March 1995 issue of ".NET" was particularly focused on music, with lots of information about music and bands on the net. Even back then, it was pretty obvious that the music industry was going to have to change. A site called The Internet Underground Music Archive (IUMA) was already offering web-space to unsigned bands so that fans could download their music directly. The magazine gives their site a good review, but notes that:
"... the songs themselves are available as stereo MPEG audio files, but file size runs at a whopping 1Mb per minute, so a four minute tune would take approximately a zillion years to download from the UK."
Although the bandwidth wasn't there yet, people could still see where the future lay:
"IUMA subscribes to the growing view, that CDs will soon be compiled at home, with the music downloaded through fibre-optic cables to recordable CD-ROMs. 'This will represent the future of music distribution,' agrees Michael Stone, an LA lawyer who has provided free legal advice for IUMA. 'Once fibre-optic cables are hooked up to every home, you can kiss the record and video stores goodbye.'"
Pretty prophetic ... well, except for failing to predict the rise of MP3 players, the fact that broadband speeds can be achieved without fibre-optics, and that people do still kindof like buying CDs and going to record shops.

Finally, there was an interview with Ricky Adar, who in March 1995 was preparing to launch his Cerberus Digital Jukebox system. Cerberus was basically iTunes Store - an integrated online music purchasing, downloading and playing system with built in DRM (except they didn't call it DRM back then). But this was 8 years before iTunes Store would be launched - Cerberus had done a lot of bleeding edge work: audio compression, DRM, online payment and negotiating deals with record labels and the Performing Rights Society.

As you've probably never heard of Cerberus, you can guess that this commendable cutting-edge initiative never really took off. They did launch, and became the first company in the world to distribute music over the Internet legally. But they were too far ahead of their time - people were not ready to play music through their PCs then, and MP3 players were years from becoming commonplace. In an interview in Sound on Sound magazine in Feb 1999, Ricky said: "The truth of the matter is that we haven't had that many downloads. There is a market on the web -- but we don't think it's a market that's going to mature as fast as we'd like". Around that time Cerberus also experimented with Virtual Record Store machines in shops and cyber-cafes. Customers could choose the tracks they wanted, pay the machine, and get a CD-R burnt for them. They were in Levis stores for a bit, but it didn't take off.

Reading about Ricky Adar left me wondering what he was doing now, after such a promising startup failed to start-up. Googling him didn't turn up anything recent, so I imagined him being eternally grumpy somewhere and spending his time smashing up iPods with a hammer, having given up on the software industry. But then I found this blog post, and it turns out Ricky Adar was a pseudonym, and Richard Faria is now CEO of tenomichi.com, purveyors of some very complex looking 3D tools. As he says in a comment on the blog post, "Lets hope I'm not ten years too early again!".

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Copying data to Salesforce Sandboxes using TalenD

A common problem with Salesforce Developer Sandboxes is that they are blank. Really you're going to want some data in there, so there are various strategies for copying data from your live instance to the Sandbox. There are some paid-for solutions - SFXOrgData , Salesforce Partial Data Sandboxes - but if you've got a decent ETL tool you can build your own. There are a bunch of free ETL tools for Salesforce: JitterBit Data Loader is good for quick ad-hoc tasks but the free version makes it difficult to manage specific ETL projects or share projects with other users Pentaho Community Edition - an open source edition of the enterprise version Apatar was a free open source Salesforce ETL which still works but development seems to have stopped since 2011 TalenD Open Studio is an open source ETL tool For the task of copying data from live to a Sandbox, either Pentaho or TalenD Open Studio could be used, depending on preference. Here's a good comparison of the dif

SSRS multi-value parameters with less fail

SSRS supports multi-value parameters, which is nice, but there are a few issues with them. This is how I deal with them. Two of the problems with SSRS multi-value parameters are: You have to jump through a few hoops to get them to work with stored procedures The (Select All) option, as shown above The reason the (Select All) option is a problem is that it is a really inelegant way of saying 'this parameter does not matter to me'. If you have a list with hundreds of values, passing all of them as a default option just seems wrong. Also, if your report shows the user which items they selected, printing the whole list when they choose (Select All) is excessive. So in this post I'm going to show my particular way of: Jumping through the hoops to get Multi-Value params in a stored procedure Adding a single '--All--' value that the report interprets as meaning all the options. Getting Multi-Value params to work with Stored Procedures This is

Remote Desktop on High DPI screens

Scott Hanselman wrote a nice blog post back in January about some of the issues you might face running Windows on a High DPI screen like that of a Surface Pro or Lenova Yoga. I'm kindof mystified that he didn't mention Remote Desktop though because thats been the number one problem for me on High DPI screens. That said, if you remote into very recent Server OS's like Windows Server 2012 R2, then apparently Remote Desktop will sort out the DPI scaling automatically. Perhaps Scott hadn't noticed the Remote Desktop issue because he only remotes into Server 2012 R2. Certainly if I was Scott, I wouldn't remote into anything less than that. But, in practice, I regularly have to remote into Server 2008 machines and yes even Server 2003. If you do that from a high DPI screen, the remote desktop is rendered at regular pixel size, which makes everything tiny. Its hard to show screenshots of High DPI screens that correctly convey the pixel size, so I've photoshoppe